Just sumthing to think about...

The philosophy of one century is the common sense of the next.................think about it........

Theory of perception - 2 - GOD

Note: This adaptation or application of the theory of perception has invited a lot of odd, angry and not to mention the ‘What-the-hell-is wrong–with-u!!!’ stares…not to mention the loads of death threats that go like, ‘u tell me that again and I’ll kill u!!!’…well…this post is a rebel against all the sandals and long slender ladies fingers that have hit me before and will do so when other girl friends of mine read this… (The guys don’t give a damn…except some Christian folks…and I was exaggerating about the sandals but it will soon be a reality…so I’ll let it be).

Now…even if u have understood the whole concept of perception being the very reason we see things the way we do…by manner of comparison with an existing idea or basic degree, you may find this idea or concept to be VERY rebel in nature as it questions the existing notion of god itself.




From times immemorial man has devised a concept of an omnipotent being who has created all that is living and everything else non-living and beyond. The concept I personally follow does not have any connection and in fact denounces the very institution of religion. The institution of religion today serves more of personal and private interests than the actual reason for the inception of the institution we call religion. The de facto interest of the founders of religion was to unite people under a common belief that would help to instruct and organize people in an easier way and also spread word about the omnipotent source of energy that exists in the universe. Those who created the whole idea of religion were obviously not normal beings; they were either gifted or enlightened or were of higher order…in other words…what we call aliens today were gods at a time. That idea was recently added to my thesis after having read a book of compelling and undeniable evidence – “The chariots of the Gods”.

Anyway, the idea of gods in ancient times was that of a being with powers so unbelievable and unique that he was revered…but actually the being that was being worshipped was but a representation of god…for instance, the Egyptians worshipped the sun god, Ra. Now Ra is just a concept of a being but in fact the whole idea behind Ra’s inception is the fact that the sun is the primary source of all energy and the gods supposedly came from the sun.
So, in reality the idea of Ra was in a way developed from a simple idea or concept.

Moving on to the heart of the matter, I’d like to pose a question…”Who is god??? What is his nature??? How do we know so??? And Who in order to justify this has actually seen god??? ”.

So, in reality no one has truly seen god or experienced his true nature. How then do we proclaim that god is loving and dear and professes unconditional love????? . When you take into account all the mindless violence around you in today’s world, have you ever thought to wonder what the true idea of god is??? What could be the actual professed word of god??? What could be his nature???…is evil a sign of god too???...if so, then why have the concept of a devil??? Could it be that they are both the same but simply different representations of the same being in two different states????

Now, if you simply apply the theory to this idea and suppose that god is good, then the question lies, “Then what is evil???”…the obvious answer to that would be the Devil. But then again, scrutinizing the situation more, I ask…”Is it not the same God that controls the forces of nature the one that takes lives with it???” So then I say; suppose then that our whole concept of god is wrong…suppose we idolized what we expect of others and what we want as the word of God???

Imagine, think…the holy books are filled with a lot of loopholes…literal translation of the books would give you more and more nonsensical ideas…so obviously the wise men of the past have written such that those who are worthy alone understand what is truly written. So, those who profess religion may bend the way they translate the texts. So what if the texts are just fables…those which depict a part of godly nature???…what if it is not true entirely??...after all how can we say??...experts believe the Bible has either been tampered with or something along the way has gone wrong as there are inconsistencies.

So, what if the true nature of god is truly not all Goody-goody??? What if there is evil in him too…whoever professed that god is all good and no evil anyway???
In Hinduism, the lord of destruction, Shiva has been depicted to be good to his believers and those who praise him irrespective of his nature and at the same time delivers punishments of death or curses to those who defy him or anger him.

So, if we consider the present idea of god as we know him to be wrong is it not possible than god is all powerful but not all good and no evil??

A friend of mine once told me about Jesus (No offence to Christian readers but this is an already tried example). What if Jesus was not truly who he said he was?? What if he was the so called devil who lets say is actually all good who took human form on earth to spread his word. Then wouldn’t it mean that god is not all good but evil too. Otherwise too, people speak of the devil being the master of deception…so then why not??? If u don’t agree it is because u find it hard to let go of the concept that has been taught to us from those who never thought otherwise.

Even in the institution of Satanism, he is considered to be an omnipotent being that resides as energy within us. Though, their manner of worship and induction into the order appears more sane and thoughtful. They base their religion more upon the unseen force in the universe, that which they call Dark energy rather than a figure of power. Seems rational doesn’t it??...thinking caps if u please….so then why is it not possible that we have been following the wrong path…what if we are supposed to follow violence when necessary…

Think about it….is who we believe to be god truly god???...could it not be that our ideas of right and wrong, Devil and God are wrong??...

Theory of perception -Part 1-

Heres sheddin a lil dark shadow (its not easily accepted u c) on our present idea of right and wrong,god,etc.

In today’s world it’s pretty easy for sum one to assess a situation or an action to be right or wrong, for a person to be normal or abnormal. The same goes for sum one being judged by the public; but why exactly and how is a person judged so or better yet, how is it possible for someone to be judged so???

If u have ever wondered about this and thought about the answer but haven’t come up with an answer that quite satisfied you, then this piece of writing is for you. All that is explained by a simple theory called the theory of perception.

This theory works in any situation, so much so that most of the optical illusions are also explained by this theory…only difference being that the way of explaining the phenomenon is different and it deals with a different type of perception (optical).

Anyways, the basics of this theory can be simply put by saying that nothing but nothing can be rated without being compared with anything. This means that anything can be described or compared only by keeping a model of comparison.

Take this situation for example; some one is dancing for the first time. Now, if someone were to comment on him it is understood that he is making the comment by comparing the person with someone. Otherwise there wouldn’t be a comparison to be made.
Similarly for the optical illusions, we see the odd illusions because or eyes focus o one part of the picture and not on the other half. In some others movement is perceived because the eyes keep shifting the point of focus from one part of the picture to another, leading to an illusion of movement.

Now if u have got the have got the hang of the theory and thinking in using its principles…and you think I’m crazy I suggest u please read the theory again…coz your just comparing me to what u think but u find hard to change your point of view…heck I’m sane but you’re the one with a mental block!!!! Anyway, now comes my point of view…understand the theory and read it once more once more before thinking of what comes next.

If it is to be that people seem different to us because we simply compare them to a basic person we hold as a basis of comparison, it only means that the person is very much normal, all that matters is our comparison. To put it simpler, imagine a person of your exact same height, when u are referring to the height of the two of you say that your both the same height but u cannot make a comparison that makes one of u any shorter or taller. That is to say, if your point of comparison is the same as that which u are comparing there is no abnormality. So if we were to hold no comparison and take anyone as the way they are then there is no oddity perceived in a crowd…everyone is normal.

Now to turn the plates it’s easier to say that the person who thinks you are weird or different is the one who’s taking the wrong side…he’s got weird comparisons!!!!!
So why worry??? Your sane…. he’s the one who’s got issues!!!! ;)

The next posts may not be in favour of a lot of peoples viewpoints so if u plan of givin me death threats r sumn...id like u to know i've already had lots....u dnt scare me js cz u dnt think my way!!!...so there!!!........